Explore the evolution of leadership, the role of leaders in flat structures, and the shift away from micromanagement
W What is leadership?
Since the writings of Plato we have tried to explore the question outlining the qualities and traits which distinguish an individual as a leader. Interestingly though, Plato never used the word leadership in his infamous Republic. Rather he referred to leaders as the guardian class having traits such as bravery, strength and a sense of adventure.
A few millennia have passed since Plato graced us with his intellect, but our general view on leadership hasn’t changed from his initial reflection. Today leaders need to have an adventure of though, creating a vision for their teams. They need to be brave enough to communicate these new ideas and strong enough to follow through. This is the way to inspire and motivate those around them.
For the majority of the human experiment the notion of leadership was seen more as a power or force. In strictly hierarchical organizational structures this may exist even today, such as the military. However, in your average organization employees have a bit lower cost, in many cases even higher benefit, monetarily or psychologically, from switching organizations. Thus, the authoritarian type leadership can rarely be applied.
W.C.H. Prentice in the early 60’s radically rejected this view of leadership being the exercise of power or force, but rather began the discussion to view leaders as the creators of more democratically organized but almost anarchical environments which give freedom for employees to learn and grow while carefully aligning each individual interest to the groups.
While Prentice built the foundation, the two that have since overshadowed him are Abraham Zaleznik and Daniel Goleman. Zaleznik, a Harvard Business School professor, originally published an article Managers and leaders: Are they Different? Leading up to this article the general belief was that both were not one in the same by which managers tended to center on processes and organizational structures.
Don’t get us wrong, there is always a place in organizations for managers. However, while managers hold strongly to order leaders thrive in chaos. Zaleznik believed that leaders have much more in common with creative thinkers such as artists or scientists. In his view leaders are able to tolerate chaos and lack of structure, while also delaying closure of problems in order to understand them transparently. Managers on the other hand thrive in stability where things are running smoothly and under control.
While each organization is able to provide an answer to which is more important in each specific role, the truth of the matter is that the answer itself is one that has been evolving. While the term itself, leadership, has been around for a very long time, it is only since the birth of business that a new form of leadership has been bred: The Manager.
Businesses though have been around for a very long time themselves – Nishiyama Onsen Keiunkanthe being the oldest, founded in the year 705 in Japan. During which time the manger has flourished; but like birth and death the only other guarantee is change. The most recent change in the business world has come from the flattening of organizational structures over the last half-century resulting in the need for the evolution of the manager.
Flat organizational structures increase transparency, limit bureaucracy, decentralize key decision making as well as increasing the pace and creative opportunity. In these structures, employees are expected to be more of the “jack-of-all-trades” type pitching in on various different ad hoc tasks. This is an environment which may appear like chaos from the outside to a micro-manager of the past, but those days are over.
It doesn’t make sense to hire smart people and tell them what to do; we hire smart people so they tell us what to do. – Steve Jobs
Today, the growing trend is away from micro-management. Managers tend to be stretched thin leading to confusion among employees; which is exactly where the leaders step right in to take place. As mentioned, leaders tend to live in a state of chaos – however, organized – but their true asset comes from the ability to influence thoughts and actions of others with a common purpose a vision for a brighter future.
A boss who micromanages is like a coach who wants to get in the game. Leaders guide and support and then sit back to cheer from the sidelines. – Simon Sinek
Effective leadership is not about wielding power or enforcing authority. It's about inspiring others to follow your vision. It's about being brave enough to take risks and strong enough to weather the storm. It's about being a visionary who can see the bigger picture and a strategist who can navigate the path to success.
Leaders are often compared to artists or scientists due to their ability to think creatively and solve problems. They are known for their resilience, their ability to adapt to changing circumstances, and their unwavering commitment to their goals. They are the ones who set the pace, drive the change, and lead the way towards a brighter future. Here are ten important qualities soft skills that effective leaders must need to have:
The concept of leadership has evolved significantly over the years. From the authoritarian leaders of the past to the democratic and flexible leaders of today, the journey has been long and transformative. Today, leaders are not just those who hold positions of power but those who inspire others to achieve greatness. They are the ones who lead by example, who set the pace, and who guide their teams towards a shared vision.